THE ONE SUPREME COURT IN
WHICH THE JUDICIAL POWER OF THE UNITED STATES SHALL BE VESTED BY THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
(The above title is used
in contradistinction to the Supreme Court of the United States the
inferior court created by the treasonous congress in the judiciary
act of 1891.)
DEMAND FOR JUDICIAL
PROCESS
AND WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
ISSUE FROM THE
ONE SUPREME COURT IN WHICH
THE JUDICIAL POWER
OF THE UNITED STATES
SHALL BE VESTED.
THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRES
IT.
Comes now into
Court Michael E. DiRosa and Malinda Nicole DiRosa, self-evident
Sovereigns, shanghaied and enslaved at birth by treasonous
conspirators, to demand Judicial Process and demand that writs of
Habeas Corpus issue from the one supreme Court in which the Judicial
power of the United States shall be vested by Article III of the
Constitution. It is their duty. It is their obligation.
Furthermore, the Constitution requires it.
PARTIES
Michael E. DiRosa
is a self-evident Sovereign endowed by his Creator with unalienable
rights. This is the principle upon which our more perfect union was
formed. I possessed these endowments before government was created
and these endowments of my Creator are beyond the reach of any
legitimate government. It is self-evident.
As a self-evident
Sovereign, ruling by Divine Right, over my kingdom of one, I am
appearing in proper person as the belligerent claimant in person.
Also, by default, I am also Ambassador of my Sovereignty, Consul and
all other public Ministers of my Sovereignty. Surely, this Court
understands many hats.
I do also claim the
right, as owner in common of the common property of the Sovereigns of
the State of Louisiana and owner in common of the common property of
the Sovereigns of the United States, to represent the true and lawful
government of this Sovereign and his property interests. There can
be no doubt that the entity pretending to be the lawful government of
the State of Louisiana is no more than an occupational government of
the conquerors and enslavers of the Sovereign Citizens of the State
of Louisiana, citizens of a state foreign to the State of Louisiana
and conquering aliens in the State of Louisiana. It is confessed in
the Louisiana Constitution of the occupational government.
Furthermore. If it
could, by some unimagined conjuring, be contended that I do not
represent my legitimate government, the State of Louisiana,
representatives of the Sovereigns of the State of Louisiana, The
question must still be answered. Who is this entity calling itself
the State of Louisiana? Is it the government of the Sovereigns in
common, who I, as owner in common, do represent or is this entity the
Louisiana "reconstructed," by force of arms, into slave camps
created by a treasonous band of conspirators to hold the enslaved
citizens of the United States, subjects of their jurisdiction.
There can be no
doubt that Michael E. DiRosa has Standing in this Court. Nor can
there be any doubt that Michael E. DiRosa has a valid cause of action
and right of action.
Michael E. DiRosa
is currently held prisoner in the New Orleans area forbidden by the
occupational government from owning or operating any device by which
people or property can be transported on a public road or bridge,
including bicycles and ridden animals, under threat of repeated
arrests, incarcerations and thefts of property. Even the ability to
flee for my life has been denied me under dictate of the occupational
government, absent valid charge, trial or recourse, save this court.
Michael E. DiRosa has been so imprisoned by the occupational
government of the invaders since the 21st day of
December, 2006.
Malinda Nicole
DiRoas is a is a self-evident Sovereign endowed by his Creator with
unalienable rights. I possessed these endowments before government
was created and these endowments of my Creator are beyond the reach
of any legitimate government. It is self-evident. They are
unalienable.
As a self-evident
Sovereign, ruling by Divine Right, over my kingdom of one, I am
appearing in proper person as the belligerent claimant in person.
Also, by default, I am also Ambassador of my Sovereignty, Consul and
all other public Ministers of my Sovereignty.
Since I am
imprisoned in Shreveport and my translator is imprisoned in New
Orleans I am not able to sign the documents personally. I have
authorized my Ambassador and translator to combine our similar and
conjoined grievances into one document to simplify their redress.
There is no doubt that Michael E. DiRosa, my translator, next friend
and paternal parent has translated my intent correctly as he has
certified to me that he has.
Be it known that I
have offered the Ambassadorship of these matters to Michael E. DiRosa
and he has accepted the charge. My name written with his hand in
these matters is as valid as had it been written with my own hand. I
am the belligerent claimant in person. If anyone has any doubts as
to the validity or authority of my Ambassador, all one has to do is
ask me.
I do also claim the
right, as owner in common of the common property of the Sovereigns of
the State of Louisiana and owner in common of the common property of
the Sovereigns of the United States, to represent the true and lawful
government of this Sovereign and his property interests. There can
be no doubt that the entity pretending to be the lawful government of
the State of Louisiana is no more than an occupational government of
the conquerors and enslavers of the Sovereign Citizens of the State
of Louisiana, citizens of a state foreign to the State of Louisiana
and conquering aliens in the State of Louisiana. It is confessed in
the Louisiana Constitution of the occupational government.
There can be no
doubt that Malinda Nicole DiRosa has standing in this Court. There
can be no doubt that Malinda Nicole DiRosa has a valid cause of
action and right of action.
Malinda Nicole
DiRosa is currently held prisoner in the Shreveport area forbidden
by the occupational government from owning or operating any device by
which people or property can be transported on a public road or
bridge, including bicycles and ridden animals, under threat of
repeated arrests, incarcerations and thefts of property. Even the
ability to flee for my life has been denied me under dictate of the
occupational government, absent valid charge, trial or recourse, save
this court. Malinda Nicole DiRosa is also scheduled to be bludgeoned
by officers of the occupational government on the 23rd day
of September, 2009 when I again stand against the pretend charges of
the occupational government.
Nor, can there be
any doubt that the State of Louisiana is a party. We, as owners in
common with an equitable interest, do hereby represent the lawful
government of our Sovereignties. Any Sovereign Citizen of the State
of Louisiana is free to object.
In order to
determine if these Sovereigns do represent the government of their
sovereignties, the State of Louisiana, it must be the determined if
the entity currently calling itself the State of Louisiana is the
government of the Sovereigns in common and custodians of the common
property of the Sovereigns. Or, is the entity currently calling
itself the State of Louisiana a "reconstructed" occupational
government of a state foreign to the State of Louisiana and ruled
exclusively by citizens of the conquering state. A conquered people
subject to the jurisdiction of our conquerers.
The custodian of
our common property of the Sovereigns is the central point of the
issue. Where is the State of Louisiana and what is this monstrosity
sitting in its place.
There are no other
parties. What other party could claim standing? All other parties
that even could be considered are all citizens of a State foreign to
the State of Louisiana and subject to its jurisdiction. They were
willing participants in the subjection and enslavement of the
Sovereign Citizens of the State of Louisiana as treasonous members of
the occupational government under color of law.
One could argue
that the current King of the foreign state that invaded and
subjugated the State of Louisiana may be able to make a claim of
standing. It would be interesting to hear his legal argument on the
legality of invasion and enslavement. However, all other parties
are, by definition, subject to his/her jurisdiction. What subject
has a right to stand for his Sovereign? Unfortunately, we do not
know who that Sovereign is, therefore we have no option but to wait
for him/her to appear and claim standing, if he/she dare. Surely
his/her subjects have informed him/her. Maybe the current King of
the invading state will also send an Ambassador?
We will send a copy
of this demand to the 26th judicial district court clerk,
however, it shall not and will not be construed as an acknowledgment
of their existence as potential parties. It is done so that they may
inform the foreign sovereign they serve and to whom they owe their
allegiance. Other than that the 26th Judicial District
Court building is nothing more than an jurisdictionally empty shell
hiding the rotten core of the foreign occupational government and its
collection of tyrants, Traitors to the Citizens of the State of
Louisiana and their legitimate government, citizens of a state
foreign to the State of Louisiana, subject to its jurisdiction.
JURISDICTION
Jurisdiction vests
in the one supreme Court in which the Judicial power of the United
States shall be vested. It is self-evident.
On a federal level:
Was the Congress of the United States overthrown by a band of
Treasonous conspirators? Was the invasion and "reconstruction"
of the State of Louisiana a legal act enacted by a legitimate
Congress of the United States? Is any act by a band of Traitors
illegally in control of the Congress of the United States legal acts
of Congress? A legal treaty is impossible when Traitors and
terrorists are in control. Are there any valid courts created or
staffed by these treasonous conspirators? The Supreme Court of the
United States or the courts of appeal thereby established by
treasonous terrorists when they enacted the Judiciary act of 1891 are
perfect examples. They do not, in fact, exist, but are the
fabrication of people acting with the power of Congress, but not the
authority of Congress or We, the Sovereign People.
On the State level:
Who is this entity calling itself the State of Louisiana? Is it
the Republican form of government We were guaranteed and We, as the
Sovereigns of our government, represent? Or is this entity calling
itself the State of Louisiana the conquered territory of the
treasonous terrorists who took over the Congress of the United
States, invaded, conquered and enslaved this State of Sovereigns and
rule by occupational government? An occupational government that
expressly forbids any Citizen of the State representation and redress
of grievance. Is any part of the document pretending to be the
Constitution of the State of Louisiana valid or is it an invalid
manifesto of the conquering state containing the details of how low
one must bow to the occupational government of the conquering state.
There can be no doubt that Article VII Section 5 of the occupational
government manifesto illegally steals all vehicles, including
bicycles and ridden animals and further binds, with ropes of
deception, once Sovereign Citizens to forced extortion by tribute,
servitude and degradation.
The Sovereign
Michael E. DiRosa did seek redress to the Supreme Court of the State
of Louisiana which stooped to fraud on the face of the record and
refused to answer one simple question. Who owns this vehicle? In
fact, it was their misfeasance, malfeasance and nonfeasance that
force me to look deeper to discover that the Supreme Court of the
State of Louisiana is seated with citizens of a state foreign to the
State of Louisiana and are indeed aliens in the State of Louisiana,
subject of a foreign government to which they claim their allegiance.
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana is infested with foreign
nationals of the state which invaded, conquered and enslaved the
Sovereigns and pretend to be their lawful government. The manifesto
of the conquering state claiming to be the Constitution of the State
of Louisiana confesses this fact quite plainly.
There is no doubt.
The Judicial power of the United States is vested in one supreme
Court. Article III of our Constitution is quite plain. Original
jurisdiction is self-evident. Could an inferior court created by
congress be impartial in an action challenging the legality of that
congress? Furthermore, no inferior court created by congress could
rule on the legality of a State Constitution, a State Legislature, a
whole body of State Statutes and even the legitimacy of the State
itself and the Sovereignty of its people. Still further, what right
does a congress have when overthrown by Traitors, slavers and
thieves. It has ceased to be the Congress and all rules,
regulations, treaties, dictates, agencies, infringements and abuses
have no merit for force of arms may give you the power, but not the
right. It is self-evident. Our rights are unalienable.
I will admit that
these are not difficult questions for Doctors of Law. Men decreed
honorable by traitors and thieves, to date, have refused to answer
these simple question. To date, I can not get a judge to tell us in
which jurisdiction we stand. Furthermore the judge that is scheduled
to bludgeon and shanghai Malinda Nicole DiRosa does not even seem to
realize that he is in an admiralty proceeding in a federal court and
is intentionally and maliciously ignoring the fact that the admiralty
lien is as fraudulent as the foreign lord to whom he bows and owes
his allegiance.
It is regrettable
that these Sovereigns have found such corruption in their government
that they must demand, from one of the highest tribunal they have
created, that the one supreme Court in which the Judicial power of
the United States shall be vested fulfill its duty and obligation and
end the abuse and enslavement of not only these Sovereigns, but all
of our sworn allies and Sovereigns of the once great State of
Louisiana. It is self-evident. The Constitution demands it.
FACTS
Both Michael E.
DiRosa and Malinda Nicole DiRosa are currently imprisoned by the
occupational government of the invaders and enslavers of the
Sovereigns of Louisiana in defiance of every law of man or God and
even in defiance of the laws of the occupational government. Michael
E. DiRosa's plight has dragged on for the longest, but Malinda Nicole
DiRosa is in imminent danger of being bludgeoned, shanghaied,
imprisoned and forcibly rehabilitated into a submissive subject by
the foreign occupational government of our enslavers. Malinda Nicole
DiRosa is scheduled to stand before the gun barrel of the
occupational government on the 23rd of September, 2009
absent even the pretense of jurisdiction defending against pretend
offenses.
It was Michael E.
DiRosa who first exposed the fraud perpetrated against the Citizens
of the State of Louisiana. It was he who brought his grievance to
the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana claiming, with undeniable
and uncontested proof that Article VII section 5 of the Louisiana
Constitution illegally steals the property of the Citizens without
recourse by means of a federal admiralty lien instituted by an
illegal bill of credit.
It was during this
exchange with the Louisiana Supreme Court with the obvious fraud
committed on the face of the record and the total silence of the
Attorney General, that I began to dig deeper and discovered the awful
truth that by manifesto of the occupational government pretending to
be the Louisiana State Constitution no Citizen of the State of
Louisiana is permitted to hold any statewide elective office. There
can be no doubt. It is confessed. The proof is positive and
irrefutable. This entity calling itself the State of Louisiana is
not the government of the Sovereigns, custodian of their common
property. There is not one Citizen of the State of Louisiana in this
occupational government. The entity calling itself the Supreme Court
of the State of Louisiana is incapable of ruling as it is improperly
set with treasonous enslavers of the foreign state which conquered
the Sovereigns of Louisiana and forced them into bondage. The
Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana is infested with Traitors to
the Sovereigns of the State of Louisiana and their legitimate
government. It is confessed.
These Sovereigns do
openly and notoriously, as the belligerent claimants in person,
denounce this fraud pretending to be the State of Louisiana and
demand that all illegal acts committed by the illegal congress and
their occupational governments be declared null and void.
This is not the
first time that these Sovereigns have reached out to the one supreme
Court in which the Judicial power of the United States shall be
vested. Both sovereigns have, both individually and in concert,
repeatedly tried to seek redress of grievance. All attempts have, to
this date, been intercepted by the clerk of the Supreme Court of the
United States who has repeatedly summarily ruled.
Many variations of
title were tried. Variations of title and demands for forwarding of
the documents were tried. Demands for information pertaining to the
whereabouts of the one supreme Court were ignored. Always, the clerk
of the Supreme Court of the United States waylaid these documents,
obviously intended for another court, and issued summary judgment.
Are we to believe
that the clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States does not
know that the Supreme Court of the United States is an inferior court
created by congressional act in 1891? Are we to believe that the
clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States does not know that
there is a superior court to his inferior court? Are we to believe
that the clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States does not
know the whereabouts of the superior court? Are we to believe that
the clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States can find no one
to ask?
The last attempt
was entrusted to the United State Postal Authority on the 8th
day of September, 2009, certified mail, return receipt requested.
This is a demand for Judicial Process made by the Sovereign Michael
E. DiRosa. It was addressed to the international address as follows:
The one supreme Court in
which the Judicial power of the United States shall be vested
1 First St. N. E.
Washington, District of
Columbia
United States of America.
Address correction
requested.
To date, the return
receipt has not returned, the mail has not been returned to the
return address, no address correction has been received and no word
has been heard from the one supreme Court, and the date of the
bludgeoning of Malinda Nicole DiRosa fast approaches.
Considering past
experience, it is entirely likely that the clerk of the Supreme Court
of the United States has, yet again, waylaid the documents. But, as
yet we have no proof.
This has left us
with no other choice but to again try to reach the one supreme Court
in which the judicial power of the United States shall be vested in
order to put a stop to the scheduled bludgeoning of Malinda Nicole
DiRosa until these serious charges can be examined.
Note must be taken,
at this time, to the obvious. I, Michael E. DiRosa, personally and
singly, find it impossible to believe that, if the one supreme Court
in which the Judicial power of the United States shall be vested does
indeed still exist, the justices of that Court are not aware that I,
singly and in concert, have been beating on their door for literally
years. And I, Michael E. DiRosa, personally and singly, find it
impossible to believe that the justices of that one supreme Court are
not aware of the unimpeachable correctness of my claims. However, in
the jot and tittle counting contest that this has degraded into I
will try my best to ensure that every jot and tittle is correctly
placed.
Malinda Nicole
DiRosa was arrested, incarcerated and ransom demanded on the pretend
charge of a tort committed against the holder of a known invalid
admiralty lien. The occupational governor of the invading state has
sent his ambassador, the secretary of the Department of Public Safety
and Corrections, to enforce this invalid lien. Under their pretend
right of conquest, the occupational government did steal title to
every device by which people and property can be transported on a
public road or bridge and did proceed to rent to their subjects the
use of the vehicle the subjects themselves had to pay to purchase,
insure, operate and maintain to the satisfaction of the occupational
government.
Faced with the gun
barrel of the occupational government, Malinda Nicole DiRosa,
Sovereign, in proper person, did demand that these malicious and
fraudulent charges be dismissed. She did notice the court in word to
clear to be misunderstood and with undeniable, irrefutable and
uncontested proof that the 26th judicial district court
had no jurisdiction. Furthermore, that the district attorney and the
Department of Public Safety and corrections were perpetrating a fraud
in that the admiralty lean they were trying to enforce was invalid
and unconstitutional.
On summary judgment
of the judge, it was decreed that the admiralty lien was valid in
that the article of the Louisiana Constitution authorizing the theft
was valid. A ruling this judge has no jurisdiction to make. Even
the rules of the occupational government say that he must certify a
question to a court with jurisdiction to rule on this contested issue
of fact. Despite all evidence to he contrary, the judge ruled that
the lien was valid, that Article VII section 5 of the Louisiana
constitution was valid, that the occupational government could do
what ever it wanted and she was just going to have to take it, laws
of man and God be damned.
It is interesting
to note that the judge of the 26th judicial district court
has claimed jurisdiction under the Louisiana code of criminal
procedure. Is he unaware that this is a tort claimed by the owner,
by admiralty lien created by the disputed Louisiana Constitutional
Article? Is he unaware that admiralty cases are federal
jurisdiction? Has he never noticed the admiralty flags in the court
or understood their significance? Or, is he bludgeoning and
shanghaiing this sovereign. All of the documents seeking protection
by our government are attached as Exhibit AA and all supporting
document are referenced therein. An example of the waylaying of
documents by the clerk of the inferior Supreme Court of the United
States is attached as Exhibit BB.
Malinda Nicole
DiRosa did, again try to move the one supreme Court into doing its
duty and obligation and come to her aid while under attack from a
foreign power. Again, it was waylaid by the clerk of the
congressional court. Curiously enough, the 26th judicial
district court refused to enter the copies of the documents sent to
the one supreme Court claiming that when the one supreme Court tell
us you've found them, then we will enter the documents into the
record in this case. There can be no doubt that these members of the
occupational government know the location and/or fate of the one
supreme Court. They specifically say: "Return the enclosed
documents with certification from another court system stating that
they are true and certified copies of the original." There can be
no doubt. Even the clerk knows that there is another court system
and we are trying to find it. Now, the only questions that remain
are first can we find the one supreme Court before the bludgeoning
commences and secondly, is there any honor left in that Court?
(Exhibit CC)
There is no need to
beleaguer the details of these exchanges as they have been going on
for years. Our only purpose is to supply enough proof to demand a
full hearing in the only court of competent jurisdiction, the one
supreme Court in which the Judicial power of the United States shall
be vested to inquire into the illegal acts being done in the name of
the United States of America and the State of Louisiana.
One must also
consider that these Sovereigns are prisoners of the occupational
government of the invading state and their resources are limited.
And, one must also consider that these documents may, yet again, be
waylaid by the clerk of the inferior Supreme Court of the United
States when he again pretends to not know what the clerk of the 26th
Judicial district court does know with certainty. There is a
superior court to his inferior court and it is another court system.
Considering the
foregoing, it is Demanded that the one supreme Court in which the
judicial power of the United States, duly authorized agent of these
Sovereigns preform their duty and obligation and protect these
Sovereigns when in the hands of a foreign government. It is further
demanded that the one supreme Court due its duty and obligation and
stop these atrocities committed in the name of the United States of
America and the State of Louisiana.
These Sovereigns do
hereby certify that the above and all attachments are true and
correct to the best of our knowledge and belief this 19th
day of September, 2009.
| Michael E. DiRosa |
Malinda Nicole DiRosa |
| Sovereign in proper person |
Sovereign in proper person |
| Prisoner of a foreign government. |
Prisoner of a foreign government. |
| C/0 318 Lakeshore Pkwy. |
C/0 318 Lakeshore Pkwy. |
| New Orleans, Louisiana |
New Orleans, Louisiana |
| XXX - XXX - XXXX |
XXX - XXX - XXXX |
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Michael E.
DiRosa, Ambassador and Sovereign do hereby declare that the above has
been served upon the one supreme Court in which the judicial Power of
the United States shall be vested by the Constitution of the United
States by entrusting this document into the hands of the United
States Postal Authority for delivery.
The one supreme Court in
which the Judicial power of the United States shall be vested
1 First St. N. E.
Washington, District of
Columbia
United States of America.
Address correction
requested.
I, Michael E.
DiRosa, Ambassador and Sovereign do hereby further declare that this
document would have been hand delivered were it not for the fact that
this Ambassador and Sovereign is currently illegally and
unconstitutionally held prisoner by the occupational government
pretending to be the lawful and Constitutional government of the
State of Louisiana.
I, Michael E.
DiRosa do further certify that I have sent one copy to the 26th
Judicial Court Clerk so that the clerk may forward notice to the
foreign sovereign to whom the clerk owes allegiance.
Clerk 26th
Judicial District Court
P.O. Box 369
Benton, La. 71006
This 19th
day of September, 2009.
Michael E. DiRosa
Ambassador and Sovereign
TOP
|
