September 6, 2007
William K. Suter, Clerk
Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20543-0001
Mr Suter,
Again with the adjudgments. In the
time that you have taken to summarily adjudge that I have no right to
sue the State of Louisiana a hurricane has formed (Dean ) crossed the
Gulf of Mexico and slammed into land, killing many. In the time it
has taken to respond and return these legally filed documents, from
this prison, another hurricane has formed (Felix) crossed the Gulf of
Mexico and slammed into land, killing many. Had either hurricane
taken a different path I could be dead. At least now we agree that
the complaint is sufficient.
Your current actions indicate to me
that you must be a member of the bar. Unfortunately, it does appear
that it has been lowered again. To my mind, only a member of the bar
would continue to violate my rights so notoriously, after
constructive notice and demand to cease, with an argument that is so
absurd that to call it specious and frivolous would to give it more
credit than it is due and to call it insulting gives it less credit
than it is due.
Let me quote from HANS V. LOUISIANA
134 U.S. 1 (1890)
'It
may be accepted as a point of departure unquestioned,' said Mr.
Justice MILLER in Cunningham v. Railroad Co., 109
U.S. 446, 451, 3 S. Sup.
Ct. Rep. 292, 'that neither a state nor the United States can be sued
as defendant in any court in this country without their consent,
except in the limited class of cases in which a state may
be made a party in the supreme court of the United States by virtue
of the original jurisdiction conferred on this court by the
constitution.' HANS V.
LOUISIANA 134 U.S. 1 (1890) [emphasis added]
What was Hans doing in a circuit court
in the first place. Was he represented by a lawyer? Was that layer
disbarred by motion of the court for demonstrated incompetence as you
should be? Your own cite has proved my standing. Now why did you
return my legally filed documents?
Yet, fully aware of the risk of my
life, my continued withering in this dungeon and other harm you are
causing me, you give me some fool in the wrong court. Your ancestors
and family must be so proud. By what other fiction of law are you
now going to say that Article III Section 2 of the United States
constitution does not apply and that I am in the wrong court?
You have already proved that you
believe yourself to be the Supreme Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
of the United States. Do you also now stand for the State of
Louisiana? Are you the Attorney General of the State of Louisiana?
Will you also be the Jury? You will also notice in HANS V. LOUISIANA
134 U.S. 1 (1890) that the State of Louisiana answered. Will the
janitor of the Supreme Court of the United States stand for the
Department of Public Safety and Corrections?
If there is a defense to my suit, let
the Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, if he exists, claim
it. The Office of the Attorney General of the State of Louisiana is
fully aware of this action and knows that the clock is running on the
answer despite the abhorrent conduct of William K. Suter, Clerk of
the United States Supreme Court. Yet, the office of the Attorney
General remains silent. If my allegations or standing are incorrect,
it should be an easy task for the Attorney General to prove me
incorrect.
In point of fact, your adjudgment does
strike at the heart of my arguments and complaints. How much of the
Sovereignty of the State of Louisiana has been stolen by the invading
army of a state foreign to the State of Louisiana. By what right did
you appoint yourself Supreme Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of
the Untied States and summarily rule? Are you now the jury too?
I am also informing you that I am
submitting yet another (third) objection to your continued and intentional violation of my rights.
Sincerely,
Michael E. DiRosa
c/o 318 Lakeshore Pkwy.
New Orleans, Louisiana 70124
XXX
– XXX - XXXX
TOP
|
