Here is the judge's order denying the
dismissal. There is also page 2 which specifies who to serve with
notice. There is also the judge's rejection of the orders we wrote.
(We told you that it was common to just line through any order that
they didn't like and could write their own order.)
Curiously the copy sent us by the
Clerk's office has 2 page 10's and no page 11. We have included the
text of the other 2 orders that were on page 11. Is this simply a
clerical error on the part of the Clerk? Or, has the record been
corrupted? Did the judge not want to cancel those orders?
You be the jury. Did the judge do the
right thing? Do we now know who owns the car? (How hard of a
question is that for doctors of law?) Are there major Constitutional
issues that the judge is ignoring? Are the governor and the
Attorney general vile treasonous conspirators? Or, did he say that
we conquered you fair and square and we will abide by the rules of
the occupational government.
Notice on the service page. They have
noticed the Public Defenders office. To us he is known as the Judas
goat (the goat that leads the other goats to slaughter.)
Remember, in occupied France during
the Second World War, they had a judiciary too or was Hitler doing
those jobs himself? In fact, every tyrant had a judiciary
of one kind or another, even Saddam Hussein.
Let me leave you with a couple of
quotes from the Federalist No. 78 written by our founding fathers.
"The complete independence of the courts of justice is
peculiarly essential in a limited constitution. By a limited
constitution I understand one which contains certain specified
exceptions to the legislative authority; such for instance as that it
shall pass no bills of attainder, no ex post facto laws, and the
like. Limitations of this kind can be preserved in practice no other
way than through the medium of the courts of justice; whose duty it
must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the
constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular
rights or privileges would amount to nothing." Publius, The
Federalist No. 78.
It equally proves, that though individual oppression may now and then
proceed from the courts of justice, the general liberty of the people
can never be endangered from that quarter; I mean so long as the
judiciary remains truly distinct from both the legislature and the
Executive. For I agree, that "there is no liberty, if the power
of judging be not separated from the legislative and executive
powers." Publius, The Federalist No. 78.
| Click any page for a full size image in a new window |
|
| Page 2. Service |
|
| Canceled order Pg. 10 |
| |
 |
Here are the orders on the missing page 11
ORDER
Considering the
foregoing I have decided on concealment of an act of treason or
treasonable plot and thereby confess, by an overt act of treason, in
open court.
Sure, soon enough
people will find out and we'll be in trouble, but if I can just abuse
these people for one extra week it will be worth it.
It is further
ordered that the unconscionable harassment of Malinda DiRosa will
continue. That the District attorney will again try to enforce an
invalid lien under color of law and I will again pretend that some
law of man or God is being followed despite all evidence to the
contrary.
This __________ day
of ______________, 2009
____________________________
JUDGE
ORDER
Considering the
forgoing it is hereby ordered that this filing be transferred to the
the One Supreme Court in which the Jurisdiction of the United States
shall be vested and writs of Certiorari issue to the various courts
for the original record to be called up in all of the above mentioned
cases.
It is further
ordered that all activity in the above entitled action be stayed
pending the ruling of a jurisdictionally competent court.
This __________ day
of ______________, 2009
____________________________
JUDGE
TOP
|
