The CIRCLE'S BEACON Home Contact The Circle's Beacon
Ignorance is just Ignorant
The Overthrow of the United States of America is now mirrored on The Kings Beacon (kingsbeacon.org)
The Beacon
1. U.S. Supreme Court told me
2. Background
3. The dred scott story
4. The fall of the kings
5. The story of Hans
6. The dubious origins of 14
6 (a) Another Confession. The threat of the 14th amendment.
7. The short story
8. My vehicle my rules
9. Where's the king
10. Through the courts
11. Prohibition
12. Men and Women
13. Religion
The State Owns Your Car
 A traffic ticket is an action by the owner of the vehicle against you for misusing their property ( a tort). It is a privilege to use the owner's vehicle and it is a privilege that made them the owner.
TWO Supreme Courts
 The Supreme Court of the United States is the hightest inferior court that congress may from time to time ordain and establish.
SOVEREIGNTY
The TRUE AMERICAN TREASURE.
Shanghaied in America
The lure is Freedom.
What can I do?
Quietly - I have enough trouble.
Freemasons
Noble order or deluded dupes?
How to Stop Spam
A new approach.
 
Other sites
 
[print friendly page?]


7) THE SHORT STORY

I told you the story of Dred Scott, the slave that wanted to be King. I showed you that the United States Supreme Court said that we were born Kings, We, the Sovereign people. Why? Because we said so. They told you that a King was a Citizen of a State and, since all of the States had United, you were a Citizen of the United States. A King in any of the United States.

The United States Supreme Court told us that Africans were never meant to be Kings. Even if they were freed, they couldn't be a King. Even if they were freed we still kept them under the thumb of the Kings agents. After all, we hadn't treated them so well. If we made them Kings they would be able to carry guns and congregate like Kings. They may decide to get even.

No, the Supreme Court said, the rules are clear. If Dred had run away in Illinois he would have been free as long as he stayed in the country of Illinois. The Kings in the Country of Illinois said so. But no, he tried to get away in Missouri, the Kings in the Country of Missouri say he is a Slave. He is a slave in the nation of Missouri. So much for ignorance being bliss. In this case, ignorance is Slavery.

The Supreme Court also told us that Dred Scott tried to appear in a King's court. Only Kings can appear in a King's court. Dred had no right to even ask us for help. Everything that happened in all of the courts is bologna. Those courts had no right to stick their noses into the business of Kings. Please excuse their intrusion King Sandford. Sometimes the hired help gets delusions of grandeur.

If you read the Case, you know that I'm not bulling you.

Then I told you the Story of the butchers. The Slaughterhouse Cases. There the Supreme Court told us; Remember in that Scott case we told you that Africans couldn't be citizens of anything unless there was a constitutional amendment. Well, there has been not one but three.

The Supreme Court told us that most people believe that the Civil War was fought to free the Slaves and that most people could be wrong. What we did was turn our Country upside down. We didn't free the slaves, We enslaved the free.

The Supreme Court told us how everyone used to be born a Citizen of a State. As a Citizen of a State they had the birthright of a King of that State. And, since his State was allied with all of the other Kings in all of the other States, he was a Citizen of the United States. Should he venture into another allied country, he will be treated as well as any King of that Country, as is befitting a King and sworn ally.

The Supreme Court told us that all of that had changed. Now, we had created a new class of citizen, a citizen of the United States. Now, the rules say that all of those Africans can be a citizen of something. They can be citizens of the United States. And, we won't call them slaves anymore, they are now called subjects.

Oh, by the way. Everyone is now a subject. You know how you used to be born a King. Well, now you are born a subject. The only way you can become King is you have to want to, and you have to have a bona fide residence in the State. Then, you can be King.

I told you the story of Hans and his character. He thought he had the character of a King. The Supreme Court and his lawyer knew that he had the character of a freed Slave. His residence must not have been bona fide enough. They told Hans that the State of Louisiana can steal anything it wanted from Hans and there was nothing a freed slave could do about it.

Then I told you the story of the Dubious origins of the 14th amendment. You know the amendment that stole your right to be born a King.

In this story the Lawyers themselves tell the Supreme Court that they know that the government has been overthrown making lawyers the ruling class. But, if the Supreme Court keeps trying to force us to associate with these Africans, were going to spill the beans. Were going to tell the people that we have been lying to them.

They then proceed to tell us that they know that a small group of conspirators illegally forced the ratification of the 14th amendment and the overthrow of the government of the United States. The Government was no longer the property manager of Kings. The government was King and everyone is now a subject of the King.

Slave, surf, peasant, subject, what's the difference. They all get the same short end of the Stick.

They flat out told the Supreme Court that if you keep saying that all subjects are equal, even the black ones were going to tell.

Of course they didn't tell. Except in their journals. It's too good being the ruling class. Esquires of the King. Who knows, one day they may be a Czar.

If you have checked up on me you know that I am not kidding. But, the next question is what can I do about it?

Knowledge without a practical application is no good at all.

I went to court. I have been hunting our right to travel for decades. Yes, there is one. When I went to court I wanted to kill mandatory insurance. We made it illegal to be poor. When I started this I was much more ignorant than I am now. A lot of what I found has been found in the process of fighting my position in court. I have included my court battle on the CD. Right now it is in the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana who is actively hiding this information.

However, this is not easy to check. The cases, there are two, will not be found on the Internet. So, how do I convince you that I am not lying to you? Well, these court cases are just stories themselves. They are based upon what is written in the Louisiana State Constitution and the Louisiana Revised Statutes. Those are on the Internet and in any decent law library. Let me tell you the story of what else I've found. Then, to check up on me you just have to see if the Louisiana State Constitution and the Louisiana Revised Statutes really say that. It's just that easy.

Besides your right to be King, I am going to show you what else they've stolen. I am going to first tell you what I've found and prove it to you. Surely you will believe the Louisiana State Constitution and Revised Statutes.

Later, for those that are interested, I will walk you through my paperwork. When I started there were a lot of pieces I still hadn't put together correctly. I will show you my logic trail as I put the pieces together. For those that are familiar with court procedure I hope you find it useful. To date, it is unbeatable. I'll prove that to you too. To get you to trial, the State has to prove that they have no right to bring you to trial. Stay with me and I'll show you.

For those that have never been to court in their own defense, this is as good a place as any to start learning.

I was originally taught by a group called the Barrister's Inn. Unfortunately, they were wrong. They were very close, but wrong. They knew that their character was wrong. They were just wrong about why.

The people's fight through the Court System has been mostly trial and error. No pun intended. Barrister's Inn taught me how to think like a lawyer. They taught me the basic rules. Quite a lot of what I learned has been by taking a position in court and defending it. Then I learn by my mistakes. Never waste a perfectly good mistake.

It has been an expensive and time consuming process. Luckily, I have stood on the shoulders of the giants who went before me. This is the only reason I have been able to see so far.

Let me now give you the overview of what I found. Just like before, if at any time you don't believe me all you have to do is go look for yourself.

I will be using the Louisiana State Constitution and the Louisiana Revised Statutes. Both are available on the Internet or in any decent law library. If you don't want to use these documents you can see how it was done in Louisiana and then go look in your own State Constitution and Statutes and you will find the same thing. Don't believe me. Go see for yourself.

When I step through the paperwork I will prove to you that the Louisiana State Supreme Court is actively and through fraud trying to hide this information from you. There will be no doubt that the lawyers are in cahoots to keep you from being King. They like being the ruling class. Esquires of the new King.

But, that is harder to verify. I have included the paperwork, but to verify it, you would have to either believe that I have given you accurate documents or you would have to get a copy from the Louisiana Supreme Court. Instead, first I will tell you the stories that these cases tell. To check if these stories are correct all you have to do is look in the Louisiana State Constitution and Revised Statutes. Surely you would believe them. They're easy to find.

Before I start into this let me make a small point. You know that president we had called Lincoln. He was a self taught lawyer.

In a Legal view, the Civil War was a much different war. We had a mutual defense treaty. The Southern States broke that treaty when they seceded from the union. We had a fight about it and it ended. At the end of the Civil War everything, by law, should have been the same as it was before the War. The Union was maintained. That's what Lincoln was saying.

You've seen the lawyers confess that a small group of conspirators overthrew the country and turned all persons born here from Kings to subjects. Lincoln would have never stood for this. Now ask yourself if Mr. Booth was working alone. The conspirators in a rump Congress weren't.

If what I have told you so far sounds bizarre, you haven't seen anything yet. Thank God it's so easy to prove. The only reason they can get away with this is because you don't know what happened.

The lawyers are pretending that you know what's going on and you approve. You didn't really want to be a King. You really wanted to be a subject of the United States.

I hate to be the one to bring this to you, but the lawyers know these stories and they are laughing at you all the way to the bank. Follow along and I'll prove it to you. Some of these deceptions are so skillfully written that it will be obvious that plumbers or engineers didn't write this.

It will also be obvious why even the basics of law are conspicuously absent from our education system. The only thing that holds the system in place is our collective ignorance. Knowledge cures ignorance every time.

Let me light one small light and we can all stop cursing the darkness. Again, if it pleases your majesty, copy this and give it to some one else. When enough lights are lit we will all be Kings again. Why, because we said so. And we'll kick anyone's butt that says differently. Just like we did the first time. Reach out to your fellow King and sworn ally and hand him a CD. It's just that easy. Then, take responsibility for your kingdom and start acting like a King. Be tolerant of other Kings. Come to their aid when necessary. Marvel at the similarities and differences. Some of their ways may be better than yours? Remember the heathen Incas we destroyed? But, most of all, respect their Kingdom. You don't tell me what to do in my kingdom and I won't tell you what to do in yours. When your kingdom is perfect, help him with his. If his kingdom falls, yours is next. With such small kingdoms, we must help and protect each other.

But, I digress.

Let's start with the overthrow of the State of Louisiana. This is going to sound hard to believe but it is the easiest to check not only for Louisiana but for any State.

In Louisiana it is absolutely illegal for a Citizen of the State of Louisiana to hold a statewide elective office in the State of Louisiana. Now, take the word Louisiana out and put in the name of your State. In –blank-- it is absolutely illegal for a Citizen of the State of –blank-- to hold a statewide elective office in the State of –blank--.

Give me a minute and I will prove it to you.

Let's go back to the Slaughterhouse Cases for just a few seconds.

In the Slaughterhouse cases they said. "It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the United States, and a citizenship of a State, which are distinct from each other, and which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual."

Ok. A Citizen of a State and a citizen of the United States are distinct from each other. You can't be both. They have different characteristics. They have a different character. Remember how they danced around the character of Hans.

Remember that I showed you in the Hans case that Hans thought he was a Citizen of the State. The lawyer and the Court knew differently. Well, all he needed was to want to be a King and have a bona fide residence in the State. What's the problem.

The exact quote from the Slaughterhouse cases is "a citizen of the United States can, of his own volition, become a citizen of any State of the Union by a bona fide residence therein,with the same rights as other citizens of that State."

If the State has ceded its land, then you can't have a bona fide residence in the State and you will forever be a freed slave. Subject of the new King, the United States. The Supreme Court told you that this has happened before. All of those Countries ceded their unsettled lands to the union to pay the Revolutionary war debt.

This creates a problem.

Remember what the Supreme Court said in the Dred Scott Case. A citizen of one State has no right to participate in the government of another.

Well, now everyone is a citizen of the United States. The Supreme Court told Hans that he was the citizen of another State or a foreign state. Well, a citizen of another State or of a foreign state has no right to participate in the government of the State of Louisiana.

If there are no Citizens of the State of Louisiana because no one can fulfill the bona fide residence requirement something has to be changed.

That's just what they did.

Watch what they did in Louisiana.

Article IV Section 2 of the Louisiana State Constitution entitled "Qualifications" says:

"To be eligible for any statewide elective office, a person, by the date of his qualification as a candidate, shall have attained the age of twenty-five years, be an elector, and have been a citizen of the United States and of this state for at least the preceding five years. " Article IV Section 2 of the Louisiana State Constitution

So, in order "to be eligible for any statewide elective office" one must "have been a citizen of the United States and of this state for at least the preceding five years." According to the Slaughterhouse Cases there is a citizenship of the United States, and a citizenship of a State, which are distinct from each other, you can't be both.

"It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the United States, and a citizenship of a State, which are distinct from each other, and which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual." Slaughterhouse Cases 83 U.S. 36

If there is a citizenship of the United States, and a citizenship of a State, which are distinct from each other, then when Article IV Section 2 mentions "a citizen of the United States and of this state." to which state is it referring? It is a little remarkable, if this clause was intended to refer to the State of Louisiana, that any reference to Louisiana is carefully avoided. One can not be both a citizen of the United States and a Citizen of the State of Louisiana, which are distinct from each other, hence, no one would be eligible. It is too clear for argument that the phraseology was adopted understandingly and, with a purpose.

To follow this logic, it can not be denied that a Citizen of the State of Louisiana can not hold any statewide elective office. These offices can only be held by a citizen of a foreign state, a citizen of the United States, that has resided in the federal territories for at least the preceding five years.

Do you think that I'm making this up? Go see for yourself.

Let's go to other States. How about Texas.

The Texas Constitution has Article 3 – entitled LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT it has a section 6 – called QUALIFICATIONS OF SENATORS. Here's what it has to say.

"No person shall be a Senator, unless he be a citizen of the United States, and, at the time of his election a qualified voter of this State, and shall have been a resident of this State five years next preceding his election, and the last year thereof a resident of the district for which he shall be chosen, and shall have attained the age of twenty-six years. (Amended Nov. 2, 1999.)"

There we have it again. He must be a citizen of the Untied States and a resident of this State for 5 years. What State. Surely not Texas. He's just a freed slave, a citizen of the United States and subject to its jurisdiction.

Mississippi legislatures were laughing at the Mississippi voters who ratified this constitution. In Article II Section 8 it says that "All persons, resident in this state, citizens of the United States, are hereby declared citizens of the state of Mississippi."

You can't be a resident in the State. So, what they are saying is that all of you freed slaves will be freed slaves until you get a residence. You'll get a residence, when pigs fly.

Section 42. says;

"No person shall be a senator who shall not have attained the age of twenty-five years, who shall not have been a qualified elector of the state four years, and who shall not be an actual resident of the district or territory he may be chosen to represent for two years before his election. The seat of a senator shall be vacated upon his removal from the district from which he was elected.

Isn't it curious no where does it say he has to be a Citizen of the State of Mississippi. Just what is a qualified elector of the state, and a resident of the district or territory. How can it be that in such formal documents no one mentions a Citizen of what State. Actually, a State with a Capital S usually means a sovereign nation State of the States United. A state written with a small s usually denotes the United States king of the freed slaves, the citizens of the Untied States. But, the rule is often broken.

How about Alabama section 117 "Qualifications of governor and lieutenant governor; " The governor and lieutenant governor shall each be at least thirty years of age when elected, and shall have been citizens of the United States ten years and resident citizens of this state at least seven years next before the date of their election."

Citizen of the United States ten years and resident citizens of this state at least seven years. A citizen of the United States. Different and distinct from a King. A Citizen of the State of Alabama.

Just so you don't think I am just picking on the Southern States. How about those independent people in WASHINGTON State.

They have a section 7 called the qualifications of legislators. No person shall be eligible to the legislature who shall not be a citizen of the United States and a qualified voter in the district for which he is chosen. There it is again. A citizen of the United States. A freed Slave. No Citizen of the State of Washington can be a Legislator in that State.

Washington State went even further. They have an amendment 29 enacted in 1954. In it Article 2 Section 33 deals with Alien ownership. It says The ownership of lands by aliens, other than those who in good faith have declared their intention to become citizens of the United States, is prohibited in this state. Just who are these aliens? Could they be the Citizens of the State of Washington? If Hans was an alien in Louisiana, a Citizen of the State of Washington is an alien in the districts and territories of the United States.

A Citizen of the State of Washington is a King. A citizen of the United States is a subject of the United States. A freed slave.

In Louisiana, Hans was a citizen of another state or a foreign state. He sure wasn't a Citizen of the State of Louisiana. He was an alien in the State of Louisiana. Just as a Citizen of the State of Washington is an alien in the jurisdiction of the citizens of the United States.

Here's another one from Washington State. This one is section 25. It says "No person, except a citizen of the United States and a qualified elector of this state, shall be eligible to hold any state office. "

"It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the United States, and a citizenship of a State, which are distinct from each other, and which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual." Slaughterhouse Cases

Naw, the lawyers aren't in cahoots. Who do you think wrote these laws. They know that they've turned us all into freed slaves. But, then again, it's not so bad when you are the Esquire of the King.

Surely, I just misunderstand. In Louisiana they took care of that too. Louisiana Revised Statute 1:4 does tell us.

"§4.  Unambiguous wording not to be disregarded

When the wording of a Section is clear and free of ambiguity, the letter of it shall not be disregarded under the pretext of pursuing its spirit." La R.S. 1:4

In strait language. I don't care what you thought it meant. It means what it says.

Still not convinced? This is all just an odd coincidence? Stay with me. It gets worse.

There is an article in the United States Constitution. It is article IV section 4. In that article we are guaranteed a republican form of government. There is some disagreement on exactly what that means. However, that same section says that the United States will protect each State from invasion.

Remember Hans. The Supreme Court told him that he was a citizen of another state or a foreign State. He couldn't sue the State of Louisiana as a Citizen of a State can sue his own State. As a citizen of another state or a foreign state, he could not do anything without the consent of the thieves.

Here's the problem. If Hans was a Citizen of another State or a foreign State, then, the Governor of the State of Louisiana is also a Citizen of another State or a foreign State. In Louisiana, Ditto for our legislators and judges and the Attorney General. None of them are Citizens of the State of Louisiana. They are all citizens of the United States. Separate and distinct from each other.

Correct me if I am wrong, but if every elective office in the State of Louisiana is held by a citizen of another state or a foreign state, I call that an invasion. To date, and to the best of my knowledge, I am the only Citizen of the State of Louisiana. I have openly and notoriously claimed that I am a Citizen of the State of Louisiana and have demanded that if anyone has any reason to believe that I am not a King in the State of Louisiana that they bring forth their proof so that I may denounce it as the fraud that it is. I have made this claim from my first day in court and to date it is an uncontested fact. Yet, I am prohibited, by law, from holding any statewide public office.

If you'll check in the Slaughterhouse Cases the court says that they couldn't call the slaughterhouse corporation a monopoly because the people must have wanted it. Their interests were being protected by their representatives. They had a voice in this.

Yet, a Citizen of the State of Louisiana is unrepresented and his interests are uncared for. A Citizen of the State of Louisiana is not only denied public office. They are actually persecuted by the invading army of citizens of another state or a foreign state. You know of the same character as Hans and Dred Scott. Unfit to even show up in a Kings court. Just freed slaves and subjects of the United States.

But, who's going to complain? Remember Hans and you are citizens of another state or a foreign State. You don't have the character to complain unless the invaders consent.

I will show you latter that I tried various ways into the United States Supreme Court. But, the Clerk of the Supreme Court keeps telling me that Hans and I have no business bothering them.

I went into a formal proof, in the documentation, on the offices in the State of Louisiana. The Governor, the Attorney General, the judges up to and including the Louisiana Supreme Court, the state and federal congressmen and representatives. There is not one Citizen of the State of Louisiana to be found anywhere. They are all citizens of another state or a foreign state.

A citizen of one State has no right to participate in the government of another. Yet, citizens of the United States have taken over. They are clear and distinct from a Citizen of a State. A Citizen of a State is a King. A citizen of the United State is the subject of the property managers of the Kings.

That's the pecking order. A Citizen of a State, a King. The property managers of the Kings, the government. On the bottom rung is the subjects of the property managers, citizens of the United States, the freed slaves. The freed slaves have taken over. Funny you didn't learn this in school.

I don't have any paper documentation on the qualifications in other states. I found them on the Internet in the dead of night looking through other State Constitutions. Try it yourself. All of the States have been overthrown by those citizens of another state or foreign state, subjects of the United States. The references should be correct, but, go and see for yourself.

By now you must be pretty sure that a bona fide residence in a State is impossible. When you have to change State Constitutions to allow foreign invaders to hold office, you can be pretty sure that if it's not impossible to be a Citizen of a State. It's damn hard.

We're going to get into that later. Remember all you have to do to be a King is want to and have a bona fide residence in that State. Who doesn't want to be King. Obviously the bona fide residence must be missing.

Next I am going to talk about what else they've taken. I am going to talk about something near and dear to everyone's heart. Traffic tickets. Wait until you see what they did to the freed slaves there. For their own good, of course.

I have a slew of court cases pending concerning traffic tickets. I'll go into them in detail later for those who like to fight in court.

I am going to stick to Louisiana law on vehicles and traffic tickets. Once you see how it was done here, you will be able to find it in your own State's constitution and statutes.

We're so corrupt here that they are more blatant about it.

Stay with me. I am going to keep showing you proof that you are a freed slave until you have no choice but to believe. It's time to reclaim our Kingdoms.

I have come to reclaim my Kingdom. I am sworn to help you to reclaim your Kingdom.

Copy this information and give it to another King. Maybe he will light his signal fire too? When enough signal fires are lit, the cockroaches will scatter.


TOP
The overthrow of the U.S.A.
6) The Dubious Origins of 14 7) The short story 8) My vehicle my rules
The Quest
Download the whole site.
Another Confession
The threat of the 14th amendment.

We have been showing you that:
1) The 14th Amendment stole our unalineable rights.
2) The story of the 14th Amendment is the story of the overthrow of the United States.

Here is a confession from the South Carolina Law Quarterly. They quote Andrew Johnson (President after Lincoln.) Will you believe them?

Why is this history different from the one you learned?

Another Confession. The threat of the 14th amendment.
LATEST 1/22/10
1/22/10
Objection to the inquisition
1/20/10
Trial - Statement of the Sovereign
12/30/09
U.S. Supreme Court
betrays us all,
again.
12/21/09
USSC Judicial Process
OSC Judicial Process
11/20/09
APPEAL Denied
10/23/09
APPEAL to the
Court of Appeal,
Second Circuit,
State of Louisiana.
9/23/09
The Rape of Dignity.
The Victim goes to court
172621-Statement of Accused -Court appearance
Our highest court has
"GONE MISSING"
More to come.
It's legal until the gavel slaps.
(When hell freezes over.)
Hell hasn't frozen, YET

Do you really think that someone is going to slap their head and and say; Oops you caught us? Who cares if one victim knows how he's being cheated? They've been cheating you since 1867.

JURY, SOVEREIGNS, ALLIES.
The evidence is before you.
Am I Right or Wrong?
Will the Jury please rise and
DECLARE THEIR VERDICT.
What can I do?
(Quietly - I have enough trouble.)
GUIDED TOUR
Through the courts
Supporting doc guide
SUPPORTING DOCS
U.S.C. title 28 Sec. 1251
U.S.C. title 28 Sec. 1254-1257
Scott v. Sandford
Slaughterhouse Cases
Hans v. Louisiana
The dubious origins of the
14th Amendment (jpg)
The threat of the
14th Amendment (jpg)
National Exchange Bank of Baltimore v. Peters
Louisiana Constitution Article I
Louisiana Constitution Article IV
Louisiana Constitution Article V
Louisiana Constitution Article VII
L.R.S. Ch. 9 Dept. of
Public Safety and Corrections

Times Picayune article 4/4/07 (jpg)
driver license application
front (jpg)
driver license application
back (jpg)
supreme Court
J.P.-Unable to assist - copy 9/30/09
H.C. Failed to make changes 9/30/09
Demand Process-Habeas Corpus 9/19/09
H.C. Certified Mail 9/19/09
Demand for Judicial Process 9/8/09
J.P. Certified Mail 9/8/09
Return amendment -copy 7/23/09
Note to scotus clerk 7/21/09
Note to supreme Court clerk 7/21/09
Return for S.A.S.E. 7/21/09
scotus-re-treason.jpg 7/20/09
scotus-re-mnd-2.jpg 7/20/09
scotus-re-mnd.jpg 7/17/09
amend habeas corpus 7/15/09
supreme note clerk 7/2/09
supreme treason 7/2/09
supreme-forma-pauperis 7/2/09
habeas_corpus 7/2/09
SECOND FRONT 26 JDC
Objection to inquisition 1/22/10
Trial - Statement of the Sovereign 1/20/10
U.S. Supreme Court refuses to help you. 12/30/09
USSC Judicial Process 12/21/09
OSC Judicial Process 12/21/09
2nd Circuit Appeal deny. 11/20/09
172621-Appeal 2nd Circuit. 10/23/09
172621-Statement of Accused -Court appearance 09/23/09
172621-Continuance and Particulars denied 07/24/09
172621-clerk-respond 07/20/09
172621-clerk-return 07/10/09
resend Habeas Corpus (text) 07/08/09
172621-clerk-return (jpg w/note) 07/08/09
172621-particulars 07/08/09
172621-continuance 07/08/09
Dismiss Denied 06/24/09
26 JDC: no jurisdiction 06/03/09
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
ussc: Louisiana - Treason 03/13/09
ussc: leave to file 10/11/07
ussc: original action 10/11/07
ussc: summons 10/11/07
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
scotus: Original Jurisdiction
  Leave to File
7/9/07
scotus: Original Jurisdiction 7/9/07
scotus: Does not comply (jpg) 7/13/07
scotus: OJ Object to Return 7/23/07
scotus: OJ Object to Return #2 8/3/07
Suter demand 8/3/07
scotus: OJ No Jurisdiction
orig (jpg)
8/21/07
scotus: OJ Object to Return #3 9/6/07
Suter demand #2 9/6/07
scotus: OJ apply to Scalia 9/6/07
scotus: OJ No assistance
orig
9/12/07
scotus: Scire Facias
 Leave to File
9/21/07
scotus: Scire Facias 9/21/07
scotus: Scire Facias Exhibit A
9/21/07
scotus: Scire Facias Summons
9/21/07
scotus: Scire Facias No Assist copy (jpg) 9-28-07
9-12-07-sc-no-assist-1-2nd.jpg 9-12-07
-sc-no-assist-1.jpg 9-12-07
-sc-no-assist-1-orig.jpg 9-12-07
-sc-no-assist-1-orig-pg2.jpg 9-12-07
-sc-no-assist-2.jpg 9-12-07
sc-no-comply-.jpg 7-13-07
sc-nojur--orig.jpg 8-21-07
env-sc-postmark-.jpg 9-17-07
LA SUPREME COURT
131 La. Supreme
1/22/07
131 Sent proof of judgment
1/22/07
131 pleadings filed (jpg) 1/24/07
131 env (jpg) 1/25/07
131 transfer jurisdiction
 cover letter

3/5/07
131 transfer jurisdiction
3/5/07
131 transfer env. (jpg) 3/6/07
131 Object Transfer Jurisdiction
3/12/07
5th denies transfered "writ"(jpg)
3/12/07
5th denial envelope (jpg) 3/12/07
131 Object Ruling of the 5th 3/15/07
131 sent missing docs
cover letter
3/17/07
131 Objection returned (jpg)
 Transfer Jurisdiction
3/19/07
131 Object returned (jpg) env. 3/20/07
131 Object central staff 3/26/07
131 Brief in Support 3/30/07
866 Appeal 4/2/07
131 Demand Summary 4/13/07
131 Sent more copies 4/19/07
866 Pleadings filed 4/27/07
866 Object incorrect record 5/7/07
866 Demand Summary
  in open court
5/21/07
131 Demand Summary
  in open court
5/22/07
131 Return vehicle 5/23/07
866 Return vehicle 5/23/07
866 Summary referred (jpg)
 page 1
6/7/07
866 Summary referred (jpg)
 page 2
6/7/07
866 Summary referred (jpg)
 env
6/7/07
866 Deny "writ" (jpg) 1/25/08
F1523230, F1525159, F1678532
Summons JP-p57425 (jpg) 1/15/04
Internal affairs 20040112
 no inventory
1/15/04
Summons SP b7819915 (jpg) 2/4/04
Summons SP B8484588 (jpg) 11/16/06
Summons JP-R44686 (jpg) 12/21/06
Summons JP-R44687 (jpg) 12/21/06
Internal affairs 20061209
  arrest officer
12/21/06
Internal affairs 20061209
 detention
12/21/06
Dismiss want jurisdiction 12-28-06
F1523230 Contempt (jpg) 12/28/06
F1523230 Trial Notice 1 (jpg) 12/28/06
F1525159 Contempt (jpg) 12/28/06
F1525159 Trial Notice 1 (jpg) 12/28/06
F1678532 Trial Notice 1 (jpg) 12/28/06
F1523230 Bill of Particulars 1/17/07
F1525159 Bill of Particulars 1/17/07
F1678532 Bill of Particulars 1/17/07
F1523230 Trial Notice 2 (jpg) 2/28/07
F1678532 Trial Notice 2 (jpg) 2/28/07
New set of trial notices (jpg)
 trial on 10/28
7/30/08
F1523230 Space trials 08/26/08
F1525159 Space trials 08/26/08
F1678532 Space trials 08/26/08
F1523230 Formal Treason 09/16/08
F1525159 Formal Treason 09/16/08
F1678532 Formal Treason 09/16/08
F1523230 minutes (jpg) 10/28/08
F1525159 minutes (jpg) 10/28/08
F1678532 minutes (jpg) 10/28/08
f1523230-construct-notice 11/1/08
f1525159-construct-notice 11/1/08
f1678532-construct-notice 11/1/08
F1681551
F1681551 Improperly Set Court 12/28/06
F1681551 Jail house defense 1/22/07
F1681551 Arraignment 2/28/07
F1681551 Minutes (jpg) 2/28/07
F1681551 Clerk Receipt (jpg) 3/2/07
F1681551 Trial Notice (jpg) 3/2/07
F1681551 Particulars 4/6/07
F1681551 Jury and Witnesses 4/7/07
New set of trial notices (jpg)
 trial on 10/28
7/30/08
F1681551 Space Trials 8/26/08
F1681551 Formal Treason 9/16/08
F1681551 minutes (jpg) 10/28/08
f1681551-construct-notice 11/1/08
Various docs
Withdraw Regis (jpg) 1/15/04
Wrecker Request (jpg) 1/15/04
returned vehicle (jpg) 1/22/04
Withdraw Registration (jpg) 12/21/06
Wrecker Request (jpg) 12/21/06
Won't return vehicle (jpg) 12/22/06
DPSC demand vehicle 1/22/07
Traffic court entry slip (jpg)  
Bond Federal Order (jpg)
 charge 32-1304-e
12/22/06
Bond Federal Order (jpg)
 charge 32-411
12/22/06
Bond Federal Order (jpg)
 charge 32-51
12/22/06
Bond Federal Order (jpg)
 charge 32-863-1
12/22/06
Bond Federal Order (jpg)
 charge 47-507
12/22/06
Bond Attach (jpg)
 F1523230
12/22/06
Bond Attach (jpg)
 F1525159
12/22/06
Bond Receipt (jpg)
 851065d
12/22/06
Bond Receipt (jpg)
 851066d
12/22/06
Bond Receipt (jpg)
 851067d
12/22/06
Bond Receipt (jpg)
 851068d
12/22/06
Bond Receipt (jpg)
 851069d
12/22/06
Bond Receipt (jpg)
 851070d
12/22/06
Bond Receipt (jpg)
 851071d
12/22/06
This page was created by The Circle of Light Church (www.WeAreAstrologers.org)
Nobody necessarily agrees with anybody.
Copyright © The Circle of Light Church 2009